Armenian Assembly Analysis of Turkey’s Election

By Alin Ozinian

Armenian Assembly Regional Analyst

The results
of Turkey’s snap election on November 1 indicated that the ruling Justice and
Development Party (AKP) regained a Parliamentary majority with 49.5% of the
vote. The Islamist-rooted AKP secured 317 seats in the Parliament, which is
more than necessary to continue its single-party rule for another 4-year term.

Experts and
analysts in Turkey and abroad believe that returning to a single-party
government will boost Erdoğan’s power while deepening social and political

The results show
that the main opposition, the Republican People’s Party (CHP), kept its seats
with 25%; the Nationalist Movement Party saw a 4% decline; and the pro-Kurdish
Peoples’ Democratic Party’s (HDP) managed to reach the country’s 10% requirement
in the election. Most analysts had expected AKP to fall short again, similar to
the June elections, but surprisingly it picked up millions of votes at the
expense of the nationalist MHP and pro-Kurdish HDP

In the
previous election, President Erdoğan conducted an election campaign across the
country by launching rallies in favor of the AKP, a factor considered to have
played into the decline of the AKP votes and support. In comparison, this time
he preferred to remain behind the, a strategy that seems to have worked. Also,
the rhetoric articulated by leading AKP figures, claiming that an environment
of chaos and economic instability will prevail in the country if the AKP faces
yet another defeat in the election, seems to have yielded the desired result.

When the AKP
lost the majority in the June election, blame was put on the Kurds by claiming
that they deceived the government during the Kurdish settlement process. The
Kurdish settlement process was launched in 2012 with the aim of solving the
Kurdish problem, prompting the AKP government to cease negotiations and re-launch
a war in the country’s southeast region against the Kurds.

showing authoritarian tendencies through repressive policies over the country’s
dissenting voices, the AKP played the nationalism card by waging war against
the country’s Kurds, reaching its goal to rule the country single-handedly.

Number-one Item on Turkey’s Agenda

however, seems to have failed to obtain the votes that will enable it to amend
the constitution in line with President Erdoğan’s wishes to put in place a
presidential system in Turkey that replaces the current parliamentary system,
paving the way for a one-man rule.

Right after
the elections, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu called on Turkey’s political
parties to agree on a new constitution. President Erdoğan has overtly supported
the creation of a new constitution that would transition to a presidential
system as the number-one item on the agenda of the newly elected legislature.

need to solve the issue of a new constitution was one of the most important messages
of Nov. 1. The nation is waiting for this,” Erdoğan said. This time he did not
directly refer to his ambition to create an executive presidential system. Earlier
the same day, presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın said Turkey was
considering holding a referendum on changing to a presidential system.


Main Opposition Parties

The main
opposition leader of Republican People’s Party (CHP) Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu stated
that the election results put further responsibility on the shoulders of the
CHP. The CHP received 25.3 % of the national vote, earning 134 seats in

picture put more responsibility on the CHP. The change in the CHP is positive and
it will continue decisively,” Kılıçdaroğlu said during a press conference. “Nobody
should fear about Turkey’s future. It was the CHP who brought democracy to this
country and it will be the CHP again who will strengthen it,” he added.

The leader
of Turkey’s pro-Kurdish People’s Democratic Party (HDP) Selahattin Demirtas
remarked that unfair election conditions and a deliberate policy of
polarization by President Erdoğan explain their drop-off in this snap election.

The HDP was forced to cancel election rallies
following two deadly attacks on pro-Kurdish gatherings since July. Television
stations gave party representatives little air-time amid government attacks
branding the party as the political wing of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).
“There wasn’t a fair or equal election…We were not able to lead an election
campaign. We tried to protect our people against attacks,“ Demirtaş told

Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli, who denied claims that he stepped
down as the MHP chairman following the election, said results do not change
Turkey’s gloomy picture and he will work for the goals of the party until his
last breath. MHP lost nearly 4 % of electoral support compared to the June
election. “All cadres of our party are wholeheartedly at the helm of their jobs.
May God…not put us away from our goals, principles and the consciousness of
being a member of the Turkish nation,” Bahçeli said in a written statement.

Free and Fair Elections?

During the
critically important general election and amid high social polarization, there
were claims about possible attempts of vote rigging from various parts of the
country. According to Turkish media reports, presiding ballot officers in some
provinces, including İstanbul and Ankara, asked other ballot officers to sign
blank documents on election results that were supposed to be filled in
following the vote count.

In the last
five months, the Turkish press was under growing pressure from the AKP government,
with physical attacks on independent media outlets and journalists. Some
newspapers and television channels were seized by state institutions only days
before the elections, while almost all public and private broadcasters only
served the AKP and the president.

Erdoğan made a call on November 2 for the whole world to respect the country’s
parliamentary election result, which gave the AKP he founded nearly 50 % of the
votes. Speaking to reporters after praying at a mosque in Istanbul, Erdoğan
said Turks had voted for stability on November 1 after the failure of coalition
talks following the June vote.

Three Armenian Candidates in the Parliament

HDP İstanbul
Member of Parliament (MP) Garo Paylan, CHP İstanbul MP Selina Doğan, and AKP
İstanbul MP Markar Esayan were elected to the parliament on June 7 and will
remain in the parliament during the 26th term. There was speculation though
that Esayan might not be elected, since he was the 14th candidate. However,
with the increase in the AKP votes, he is in the parliament once again.


Alin Ozinian is the Regional Analyst at the
Armenian Assembly of America. She is currently a Ph.D. Researcher at Yerevan
State University’s Faculty of Political Sciences. Follow her on twitter at

Three Armenians Elected to Turkey’s Parliament in Historic Vote


(Garo Paylan, Selina Dogan, Markar Esayan)

By Nick Rejebian (@nrejebbs), Assembly Public
Affairs Intern

AAANews Blog


9, 2015

86% of Turkey at the ballot box on Sunday, three Christian Armenian candidates,
Garo Paylan, Selina Dogan, and Markar Esayan, were elected to the Turkish

Paylan, a founding member of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), was elected
in the Istanbul 3rd Region. Born in Malatya in 1972 and raised in
Istanbul, Paylan began working humbly as a manager at Armenian schools. Since
the HDP’s founding in 2012, Paylan aided its growth as a member of the party’s
central executive committee. In Sunday’s election, Paylan competed for one of
31 regional seats; and with HDP receiving 14% of the vote and five seats,
Paylan won the 2nd seat.

Dogan, of the Republican People’s Party (CHP), is the first elected
Armenian female deputy Member of Parliament, representing Istanbul’s 2nd
Region. Born in Istanbul in 1977, Dogan rose quickly in academia as she pursued
her Faculty of Law from Galatasaray University, and completed her graduate
studies at the Informations University. With 26 regional seats at stake, the
CHP won 27% of the votes. Of these eight seats, Ms. Dogan was elected to the 1st
seat garnering the most votes of the CHP in the district.

Markar Esayan, a member of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) competed in
Istanbul’s 2nd region. Born in 1969 in Istanbul, Esayan began
writing for the bi-lingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos in 1997, and left the pro-AKP daily newspaper Yeni Safak to run for parliament. Esayan
is also a published novelist having written five books since 2005. For the 2015
election, the AKP won 42% of the vote in the Istanbul’s 2nd region
thus earning 12 of the 26 seats. Esayan was elected to the 12th

estimated 70,000 Armenians live in Turkey today, and with the Turkish
population around 78 million Armenians make up less than 0.01%. The Armenian community
in Turkey now has three individuals, proud of their heritage, representing them
in the Turkish parliament. The question is, will the voices of the suppressed finally
be heard in what promises to be the beginning of a new liberal democracy in


Rejebian is an intern with the Armenian Assembly for America’s Terjenian-Thomas
Summer Internship Program in Washington, DC. A native of Evanston, Illinois,
Nicholas studies Political Science and Economics at Dickinson College.